Recently, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has asserted that the Assessing Officer (AO) cannot travel for any reason except for the selection of scrutiny for limited scrutiny, according to the Central Board of Direct Tax (CBDT) circular. It was held in the case of the assessee, Duckwoo Autoind Pvt. Ltd. After the said company filed the return of income, the AO conducted the scrutiny assessment via CASS as per the limited scrutiny assessment, which is issued by the notice under section 143(2) of the Act 1961.
However, the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) issued a notice under section 263 of the Act 1961 and found the incurred expenses of the assessee should not be permitted. PCIT also noted that the AO accepted these expenses without proper inquiry, marking the scrutiny assessment faulty as per the interest of the Revenue. PCIT dictated the AO to reframe the scrutiny assessment to which the AO presented an appeal before ITAT.
M. Abhishek, who counsels the assessee, states that the AO had assessed two issues and produced his scrutiny assessment accordingly. However, now PCIT is bringing forward a new issue where the depreciation, pre-operative expenses, expenses relatable to administrative processes, and employee benefits, which come to one crore rupees, need to be disallowed. In that case, Mr. S. Maruthu Pandian suggested that PCIT cannot ask for a reframing of the assessment for a limited scrutiny assessment. Considering both parties, the division bench of ITAT that includes Mahavir Singh (Vice President) and Manjunatha (Accountant Member) has accepted the appeal by the assessee and stated that the AO is not to examine other issues except for the selected ones in the limited scrutiny assessment.
